May 2001 posts

April 2001  

More May 2001


Does Darla still have an invitation into Buffy's house? -- Halcyon, 01:05:58 05/01/01 Tue

Following the events of Epihany, Darla has apparently LA for good. Now that she knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that Angel's sleeping with Buffy = perfect happiness and that Angel's sleeping with her= perfect despair, will she try to get some measure of revenge on Angel by attempting to harm Buffy in someway? Remember Buffy does not know that Darla has been raised and turned back into a vampire and as far as I know the de-invite spell has not been performed for Darla's access to Buffy's house.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Does Darla still have an invitation into Buffy's house? -- Rufus, 02:12:13 05/01/01 Tue

Now that is a question....did Darlas dusting negate the invite...or does it still stand...

I think that it could make for an good story about a surprise visit for Buffy. And could you imagine if Darla were the one to tell Buffy how Angel got his Epiphany?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Does Darla still have an invitation into Buffy's house? -- Halcyon, 07:00:09 05/01/01 Tue

Spike knows that Darla has been raised and turned back into a Vampire and some of what Angel has been up to recently. Will he keep that information to himself or will he tell Buffy about it?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Does Darla still have an invitation into Buffy's house? -- Lyn, 16:55:05 05/01/01 Tue

Buffy and Angel are pretty much living seperate lives now. Who told Angel about Joyce? Was it Giles, or Willow? Or maybe spike made a phone call? Dru went to Sunnydale to get Spike back. Did she think to put Spike against Angel? Did Buffy tell Angel that Dawn is the key? That Glory is a god? Maybe Wesley could find something in his books about Glory that the other watchers don't know. It doesn't seem like Angel and Buffy are telling each other very much. I don't think he told her about the lawyers he locked in the wine cellar.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Does Darla still have an invitation into Buffy's house? -- Halcyon, 09:25:56 05/03/01 Thu

But Angel knows Darla was invited into Buffy's house, after all he finds her after she feeds on Joyce. Do you't think better safe than sorry - inform Buffy so the de invite spell could be performed to prevent the possibility of Darla gaining access to Buffy's house.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Does Darla still have an invitation into Buffy's house? -- Sue, 23:25:47 05/01/01 Tue

Of course it is ultimately up to the writers (sorry for the bit of reality here) but my guess would be no.

This comes from my belief that it is a different demon inside this vampire, yes with the same memories of the other vampire, but still a different vampire.

I am of the opinion that they didn't "bring back" Darla. In the respect that they didn't snatch "Darla's" soul out of wherever it was after Darla died. What they did, in my opinion was they created a new body out of Darla's DNA(actually they used magic, not science, but to put it into scientific terms for a moment just to serve as a model they made a "clone" of Darla.) Then into that body they stuck (still using magic) all the memories that Darla had until Angel staked her.

The effect was almost exactly the same, and in that respect they "brought back Darla", but to be technical it was a "different" vampire who was invited into Buffy's house in season one. Different but the same (if that makes any sense).

To sum it up. Darla is vamped by the Master (she dies?). Angel slays Darla vamp. The demon within her either is destroyed, goes into the vamp hell (is there a vampire afterlife?) whatever.

New Darla. Old Memories (I am resisting using the Star Trek hologram analogy, but it is difficult). New Darla is vamped by Dru (New Darla dies?) Different Demon enters body (as the other demon is no more).

As this is a different Vampire, I would think that she would have to be invited in. But again who knows? Perhaps since this new vampire is so close to the original vampire who was invited in, the rules get confused.


Cordy, Gunn & Wesley's reaction to Angel's return to the fold. -- Halcyon, 04:37:07 05/01/01 Tue

On several websites I have seen several people attack the way C, G & W acted towards Angel. One of the reasons given is that they just dismissed his obssession with Darla. That is wrong for a start. First Wesley knew that Angel had staked Darla three and a half years, he had no reason other than the dreams Angel was having to suspect Darla was back. Cordelia and Wesley tried reasoning with Angel on several occasions from Dear Boy, the start of Guise Will Be Guise, Darla and Reunion.

It is easy to commend C, G & W actions towards Angel after Reunion but let's not forget how Angel acted towards them particularly in Blood Money and Reprise.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Cordy, Gunn & Wesley's reaction to Angel's return to the fold. -- Lyn, 16:47:51 05/01/01 Tue

Cordy believed in Angel when no one did. Sure she carries a cross in her purse, keeps holy water in her desk, but they have gone thru so much together (Doyle's death)and she really felt like Angel was the one person in the world besides Wesley that she could trust. She has really worked hard towards his goal of redemption and then he locks the lawyers in the celler with Darla and Dru! Then he fires them! (Remember "you can't fire me I'm vision girl, Ha!)Beside Angel was the one place Cordy felt like she belonged (since leaving high school). I don't think C, W, & G have been near hard enough on Angel. He totally betrayed them. And it wasn't Angelus, that they could at least understand that evil took over. Wait till they find out that he did sleep with Darla, and risked everything!!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Cordy, Gunn & Wesley's reaction to Angel's return to the fold. -- Traveler, 22:32:49 05/01/01 Tue

The main problem I have with the whole situation is that they never really tried to talk to him and understand why he was doing the things he was doing. After he fired them, they more or less let him go his own way, even though he was their friend and a potential menace. Yeah, Angel did wrong, but they did too.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Cordy, Gunn & Wesley's reaction to Angel's return to the fold. -- Halcyon, 09:40:53 05/03/01 Thu

Alright neither side is completely blameless in this matter, but look how Angel treated them in Blood Money and the way he acted towards her in Reprise. Since she started working for AI and following Doyle's death Angel has been the one constant thing she thought she had to rely upon and he goes of the deep end and fires her like he did. Also Cordelia is the only one who expresses how much she was hurt by Angel in Ephiany and Disharmony, after all he 'dared' to give all her clothes away probably including the Prom Dress that Xander bought for her this was a reminder of her life in Sunnydale before ending up in the appartment from Hell. (See City Of through to Room With A Vu)

I think Cordelia may have also somehow learned about the video of her and Wesley being broadcasted at the Charity do, with the pair of them acting like prats. This may explain why she reacted to Angel the way she did at the end of The Thin Dead Line, it certainly did not help that one of her closest friends had nearly died.


Identity (long, spoilers for "Intervention") -- Humanitas, 12:27:35 05/01/01 Tue

One of the great themes of this season has been the search for identity. The clearest example lately has been Spike (see Nina's thread about the masks coming down and Rowan's reply, in particular), but nearly all of the other major characters have been engaged in a similar search. These are in no particular order:

Giles: As the season started, Giles was having a major identity crisis. With the loss of both his jobs (librarian and Watcher), and the growing realization that Buffy was really coming into her own as a Slayer, he felt pretty useless. So much so, in fact that he was considering going back to England, until Buffy effectively gave him back his old identity as her Watcher. Even so, he still felt at lose ends. Last season was tough for him:

BUFFY: How bored *were* you last year? GILES: I watched Passions with Spike. Let us never speak of it. ---The Real Me

So he did things like buy a new sports car, classic sign of a mid-life crisis. Taking over the Magic Shop helps a lot, though. It gives him an identity independant of Buffy, which he will need if she should suddenly reach her expiration date. As a side note, Giles has an edge in re-defining himself over the other characters: he's done it before, when he chose to not be Ripper any more.

Xander: We all thought we knew Xander. He's the Zeppo, the token Normal Guy in the SG. In fact, my personal take on the show was "I wanna be Giles. I know I'm really Xander, but I wanna be Giles." Yeah, ok, he's the 'heart' of the group, but what does that really mean? Now we know. Ever since "The Replacement," Xander has been given the only thing he ever really lacked: self-confidence. Seeing his Suave Self from the outside allowed him to realize that he did have those characteristics, that he was not doomed to Scruffiness. This has removed the defeatism that was blocking his development allowing him to become the most clear-headed of the SG, his attitude toward Spike notwithstanding.

XANDER: I lied. See, what I think, you got burned with Angel, then Riley shows up. BUFFY: I know the story, Xander. XANDER: But you miss the point. You shut down, Buffy. And you've been treating Riley like the rebound guy. When he's the one that comes along once in a lifetime. (Buffy looks dismayed) He's never held back with you. He's risked everything. And you're about to let him fly because you don't like ultimatums? [Buffy's eyes begin to water as Xander's words finally get through. ] XANDER: If he's not the guy, if what he needs from you just isn't there, (shakes head) let him go. Break his heart, and make it a clean break. But if you really think you can love this guy ... I'm talking scary, messy, no-emotions-barred need ... if you're ready for that ... then think about what you're about to lose. [Buffy looks up at him, then looks around anxiously. There are tears in her eyes.] BUFFY: Xander... XANDER: Run. ---Into the Woods

In matters of the heart, Xander Harris is now officially The Man. "Triangle" showed him having his own problems, of course, but he is capable of working them through (and with Spike, of all people!).

XANDER: And they get in these fights, and they're both looking at me like I'm the referee. Also, sometimes I'll say something about Anya, and Willow'll get this look, this, um, "what the hell do you see in her" look. SPIKE: I know that look. Lot of people never really got Dru, you know. XANDER: Well, she was insane. (Spike looks offended) Then it's like, well, I get all torn. Because, Willow's my best friend and I really value her opinion, but, uh, Anya's my girlfriend, you know? ---Triangle

Ok, still a little insensitive, but he does still have Issues with Spike. Anyway, the point is that Xander has suddenly become more adult-like, both in the material things (his new apartment, etc.), and in his relationship with Anya. He still has a way to go, but he is definitely out of the mire he started the season in.

Anya: Anya has become decidedly more human this season. Her reactions to Willow in "Triangle" and to Joyce's death in "The Body" clearly show her strugling with her human identity, but they also show her making progress. The scene between her and Xander where they are discussing children and the purpose of sex (I couldn't find this one, but I think it's in "Intervention") is particularly telling.

Tara: Tara's identity issue is essentially contained in "Family." It seems cut and dried thus far: Tara belived that she was part demon, because her family told her that she was. It turns out that she is not. She had to accept this change in her identity, and in who she identifies as her 'family.' I have to wonder if the twisted mind of Joss will allow it to remain that simple, or if there really is more to Tara than meets the eye.

Willow: Willow is really the exception to the rule. Her identity shift came last year, when she fell in love with Tara. She is still coming to grips with her powers, of course, and desperately needs to aquire a sense of responsibility for the consequences of using those powers, but she's pretty much the same now as she was at the beginning of the season.

Dawn: Dawn's search for identity is wrapped up in her discovery that she is in fact The Key, that she is in a sense an artificial person. That is, to say the least, a little hard for her to take. It drives her to do things like cut one of her wrists open ("Blood Ties"). Ultimately, we end up considering how identity is constructed. In Dawn's case, it is made up of memories, shared and otherwise. She has to learn that, at least in this case, Perception is more important than Truth.

BUFFY: Are you okay? Did she hurt you? DAWN: Why do you care? BUFFY: Because I love you. You're my sister. DAWN: No I'm not. BUFFY: Yes you are. (Lifts Dawn's arm, so we can see her arm and hand are still bloody) Look, it's blood. It's Summers blood. [Buffy presses her hand against the tire-iron wound on her shoulder, wincing a little. She clasps her bloody hand in Dawn's bloody hand.] BUFFY: It's just like mine. It doesn't matter where you came from, or, or how you got here. You are my sister. (pause) There's no way you could annoy me so much if you weren't. ---Blood Ties

Dawn's search for Identity seems to have reached, if not a resoultion, at least a pause. No doubt it will continue as we learn more about the Key and it's function.

Buffy: Buffy's continuing efforts to incorporate her identity as the Slayer into her Identity as Buffy Summers are the driving force of the series as a whole. This season, she has become more aware of those efforts, and has started to pursue them on a concious level. This process was triggered by Dracula's claim that her "power is rooted in darkness" in "Before Dawn." Buffy feels for much of the season like her 'Slayerness' is overwhelming her 'Buffyness,' that it just gets harder and harder for her to love, to be a human being, rather than the super-human Slayer. Her vision-quest in "Intervention," while cryptic, did provide her with some re-assurance, while at the same time giving her cause to worry, because, while she is "full of love," "death is her gift."

The funny part, of course, is that Joss told us that this season was going to be about identity, way back in (surprise, surprise) "Restless." I'll leave that analysis to someone else, but in hindsight it seems pretty clear.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Identity (long, spoilers for "Intervention") -- Lyn, 17:06:07 05/01/01 Tue

I think the characters search for identity just makes the show more enjoyable. Don't we all search, all of our lives? In school we search...are we a member of the "cool" group?..or the smart group?..or the athletes?..Then we search for identity as a couple, with our mate, then as a parent, in our jobs our titles define us, as we grow older we search for identity as a grandparent. It( the search they embark upon) makes the characters more human, even the demon ones.


glory's latest victim (spoileriffic) -- dan, 19:22:12 05/01/01 Tue

spoiler space...

5 * * * * 4 * * * * 3 * * * * 2 * * * 1

whew! this season of buffy's really put me through the wringer - i'm tearing up every other ep, it seems like, and i certainly did tonight when willow said the line about tara "she's my girl." any thoughts about tara's fate in the future (and, by extension, the fate of glory's other victims)?

my guess is that when glory gets dusted, that her victims will be restored back to normalcy... somewhat. sort of like they had a mild stroke. but judging from joss' comments he's made about tara's character, i'm betting she's on next season; and moreover, tara around in the vegetable state she's in right now would put a *major* hamper on willow's character. so much of willow would be all about her taking care of tara, it would preclude any other character development for her.

thoughts?

-d

ps - i'm delurking after having read this forum for a few months; i always enjoy reading it b/c of the thoughtfulness of the posts.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: glory's latest victim (spoileriffic) -- Solitude1056, 19:53:39 05/01/01 Tue

ok, spoiler space to return the favor...

(is that too much?)

anyway... agreed about Tara. I was sort of hoping that Willow was actually being all business to restore Tara, but it was much more satisfactory seeing her (at least momentarily) kick Glory's ass. Ok, not kick her ass completely, but Willow did slow her down a little. Looks like that's the secret: a combined set of forces might do the trick. Glory can hold up against one, but she can be worn down. And while I'm at it, there's another early-season spoiler that's (so far) not shown up. Wah. What was all that about Willow doing a spell & unbeknownst to her, Anya & Tara are helping her out, and somehow this may damage Willow & Tara's relationship? Given that Tara's a) mentally on vacation and b) she just spilled the news about who's-who on the Monk Lineup of New Fake People, I can't see much more damage being done...

but they'd better bring Tara back (and not just as the local vegetable garden) - I really like her character. I'll stop before I'm reduced to fan-like gushing, however.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: glory's latest victim (spoileriffic) -- rowan, 20:09:40 05/01/01 Tue

I thought it was interesting that Willow seemed almost more effective against Glory than Buffy. I don't recall Buffy really "tiring" Glory out (as Glory mentioned) the way Willow was able to.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: glory's latest victim (spoileriffic) -- Javoher, 11:43:01 05/02/01 Wed

Glory said a couple times "That witch really slowed me down" or words to that effect. I haven't been able to figure out what spell Willow was saying while she was running towards Tara, but could that have had an effect on Glory?

Or could it be that Tara, being a pretty powerful witch by herself, had the effect of 100 proof vodka and made Glory a little drunk?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> Re: glory's latest victim (spoileriffic) -- Masquerade, 12:18:10 05/02/01 Wed

I think Glory was buzzed after feeding from Tara. Glad to see you made it back onto the board!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> Re: glory's latest victim (spoileriffic) -- Javoher, 17:46:40 05/03/01 Thu

Thanks, but the main message board continues to act up for me. I just type in the URL's of individual messages, and then sometimes the navigation links, "next thread", "next message" work and sometimes they don't. I've cleared all caches twice and used three different computers. Has anyone else had any problems navigating this board?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> Re: glory's latest victim (spoileriffic) -- rowan, 17:19:07 05/02/01 Wed

I'll have to check my tape, but I thought that it was just a spell to locate Tara.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> Re: glory's latest victim (spoileriffic) -- Rufus, 18:39:50 05/02/01 Wed

Glory said:

"I think I'm getting a little buzzed from eating that witch. What a mind she had."

So I do wonder if the fact that Tara was so stable and calm if that would last longer for a god that is losing it?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Vegetable garden...LOL...... -- Rufus, 21:24:50 05/01/01 Tue

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Welcome, delurking dan! Pleased to have you join our merry band! -- OnM, 09:38:56 05/02/01 Wed

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> that expression... -- Solitude1056, 17:26:48 05/02/01 Wed

Ok, strange image that's been returning to my head repeatedly as I think back to the episode. This image that for some reason that stands out so clearly is Tara's expression just before Glory starts the vacuum cleaner routine. It was like her face hardened somehow, as if she'd made a decision of some sort. Now granted, I imagine it's hard to think straight when someone's crushing your hand into little bits - and amazing to me that Tara didn't holler about it - but that last expression seemed awfully... something. I can't put my finger on it. I'd like to think Tara was doing something internally - since she's not exactly without resources herself. I don't know what one could do prior to having your sanity sucked dry, but I've been curious as to whether Glory's post-brain buzz (and subsequent weakening during Willow's onslaught) weren't due to something Tara did in those last few seconds. Did anyone else notice it, and anyone have any ideas?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: that expression... -- Jessica, 16:48:48 05/04/01 Fri

I also think that Tara did something before Glory brainsuck her. A few seconds before Glory did her thing Tara was scared (who wouldn't be) then it seems she was doing something like a spell, and then she had a resolve face like she tought she did everything she could to protect Dawn and the scoobies and that Glory would get more than she bargain for. Tara seem to be more together than Glory's other victims, maybe what she was saying was some kind of message to the scoobies. Maybe Tara will know and be able to tell the gang Glory's weaknesses because she was linked to her. I also think that Tara is a more powerful witch than she lets on, maybe she's scared or something happenned in the past to make her restrain her powers, maybe now will see her do powerful magic and maybe find her way out of madness on her own.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Tara vs Willow -- FanMan, 12:57:42 05/05/01 Sat

Tara seems to be more in line with Wicca spirituality, she thinks of the morallity and consiquences of magic. And it is a familly tradition, her mom probebly gave her a history of spells with bad results in her familly. For natural witches that conversation would be as natural as a talk about sex, drugs, and old people with candy...eeew!

Tara is more fem/emotional of the two also. Willow is not masculine, but she is the intillect vs Tara and intuition. Willow does spells in the same way as a science project. Willow does spells for results. I think Tara is equal to Willow, but she still has self-esteem problems from her familly. Also, she holds herself back because magic is "messing with the natural order" Tara also seems to have a form of ESP that is like empathy/aura-awareness.

If her aura-awareness gave her any insight into Glory, she might have intuitavely done something that would preserve her personality more than other victums of Glory.


Scratch 'n Sniff (Tough Love Spoilers) -- Solitude1056, 20:11:00 05/01/01 Tue

ok, spoiler space just to be nice (for those of you still waiting for the episode to air)...

Ok, first we have Glory sniffing Spike, and then licking Tara's mutilated bloody hand. It appears that this is the way she determines if it's the Key. But at the very beginning, it was stated implicitly - and later explicitly - that insane/crazy people could see the Key. Glory herself, as shown repeatedly, is a few napkins short of a picnic. And she seems perfectly aware of what she's leaving behind in her victims when she feeds off them; it somehow appears to be her own insanity, as if she's trading sanity for insanity with them. I'm wondering if, when she's at the verge of non-feediness and insanity, that she might be able to see the Key by just looking at it. But by displacing her insanity into humans, she removes herself somehow from that being-able-to-see. Not sure here, just postulating, but did anyone else get all that?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Scratch 'n Sniff (Tough Love Spoilers) -- rowan, 20:15:19 05/01/01 Tue

Well, I'm not sure, but that spoiler that mentions Glory will need to bleed Dawn to death to start the apocalypse is making more sense now that I've seen the scratch, sniff, and taste-testing she's been doing with everyone's blood.

I supposed (as I was watching) that Glory knew the hell Tara was about to face after the brainsuck so well because Glory had experienced it herself. I wonder if that was her fate in hell (or wherever she was before she got here).

It seems clear Glory can't see The Key, or else she would have already known it was Dawn in the episode at the hospital when the Ben to Glory morph occurred. But could she degenerate to the point where she could see it if she couldn't feed? I'm not sure we've seen enough to know that.


Reactions from One Who Feels Brainsucked (Spoilers Ahead for Last 3 Eps) -- rowan, 20:31:28 05/01/01 Tue

Okay, let me give some spoiler space, too.

7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Here are just some first reactions to Tough Love.

1. The eps are starting to go by so fast! The first time I looked at the clock, 45 minutes of the ep was gone. Now that they've got this Glory storyline cranking, I feel like I can't wait for 4 separate eps -- I want 2 hours at time.

2. How about Spike calling Dawn platelet?! That's a new one, isn't it? Niblet, little bit, bitty Buffy...LOL.

3. Willow really kicked some skanky, lopsided, fashion victim ex-god a**, didn't she? She managed to slow Glory down more than Buffy has been able to in the past. It looks like she's going to get even more power in at least the next 2 episodes.

4. Did you notice the new tone in their voices when Buffy and Spike conversed (what are those, tunnels under the crypt?). Anyway, when Spike told Buffy that Willow would go after Glory, his tone of voice totally lost the usual sarcasm, and Buffy actually listened to him for once (although it took Dawn to convince her). Times, they are a changing (at least for now).

5. What did Giles do to the scabby minion to get him to talk? Was this a Ripper moment that was too gruesome to show us?

6. Poor Tara. Enough said.

7. Poor Dawn. I must admit, her scene with Spike was really touching. You could feel her pain. And check out Spike, providing comfort, of all things! Compare this scene to the one in Crush: similarities, but interesting differences.

8. Xander finally got a haircut - yea!

9. So, did anyone get the impression from the preview that Ben will be the one to betray them? It appeared as if he will change from Ben to Glory in front of them, and that's how Glory gets Dawn (or am I jumping to conclusions).

10. How about Spike telling Dawn, 'I know evil, and you're not evil', then telling her when she's afraid she can't be good: 'well, I'm not good and I'm okay." Spike certainly doesn't need any self-help books, does he? I guess atonement is still an unknown word to Spike.

IMHO, another great episode. I can't wait for Spiral!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Reactions from One Who Feels Brainsucked (Spoilers Ahead for Last 3 Eps) -- Solitude1056, 20:57:43 05/01/01 Tue

Ok, ok, so maybe it's true that AtltS:

10. How about Spike telling Dawn, 'I know evil, and you're not evil', then telling her when she's afraid she can't be good: 'well, I'm not good and I'm okay." Spike certainly doesn't need any self-help books, does he? I guess atonement is still an unknown word to Spike.

Ok, granted, but think about it... Dawn's major fear is that the bad things happening must mean she is also bad, somehow. She'd come to this conclusion whether it was Spike with her or anyone else - but if anyone else said, "Oh, no, Dawn, you're not evil" it's akin to Willow trying to empathize with Buffy about what Buffy's going through post-Joyce-death. They can't, she can't, and just as Buffy knows Willow's guessing, so would Dawn if anyone else tried to reassure her. But how you gonna argue with Spike, yanno? He may be a poser but he's certainly ripped it up with the best of them anyway, and he's definitively got the authority to claim to know Evil when he sees it.

What I thought interesting was that Spike's interaction with Dawn closely mirrored Gile's interaction with Buffy, at the start of the episode. This is definitely working into a Key & Protector relationship, similar to the Slayer & Watcher relationship... or at least, that's my gut instinct about it. (And was Spike feeling peckish with Dawn, or just wanting to console her - that quick hand motion up & smooth the 'do rather than reveal he was about to touch her...)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Don't get me wrong -- I loved Spike's advice to Dawn. It's just so Spike. -- rowan, 21:10:28 05/01/01 Tue

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Secondary meaning to 'platelet' ? (Endseason spoiler) -- OnM, 09:36:01 05/02/01 Wed

Don't pretend to be any kind of expert on things medical, but if I recall correctly, aren't platelets the component of blood that makes clotting possible?

Recent spoilers I have come across suggest that the purpose of the Key is that it can unlock the 'barriers' that hold the various differing dimensions of the universe apart, so all would collapse into one gihugic megaverse-- humans, demons, hells, strip malls, all together as one, all bleeding into one another.

So, you could visualize Dawn as 'the clotting factor'?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Secondary meaning to 'platelet' ? (Endseason spoiler) -- Rufus, 15:27:44 05/02/01 Wed

OnM may I take this moment to go...blood clots...ewwwwwwwwww....yes, platelets do function to arrest bleeding. Lets call it blood coagulation. Glory has said that the key is pure....and when she licked Taras hand like a lollipop she noticed the impure blood right away. So I do like how you have put the blood thing. Think of the other realities as wanting to make a tear or wound to pass into other dimensions, so it makes sense that you would want a clotting factor there to seal it up.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Secondary meaning to 'platelet' ? (Endseason spoiler) -- rowan, 17:14:48 05/02/01 Wed

Yes, I thought it was interesting given all the bloodletting spoilers floating around about Dawn that Spike suddenly called her platelet. Does this mean she has the ability to stop the apocalpyse as well as start it?

Also, considering Glory just found out The Key is human, where did she suddenly come up with this bloodtasting routine?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> Re: Secondary meaning to 'platelet' ? (Endseason spoiler) -- Solitude1056, 17:19:06 05/02/01 Wed

Not to mention, how the hell would you bleed a bicycle pump to death, anyway? *grin*

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> Re: Secondary meaning to 'platelet' ? (Endseason spoiler) -- Cleanthes, 17:27:26 05/02/01 Wed

I have had more than one bicycle pump die on me, usually with the tire only half inflated. Sometimes lack of lubrication caused the problem. Perhaps some hell god licked off all the grease?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Secondary meaning to 'platelet' ? (Endseason spoiler) -- Rufus, 18:23:05 05/02/01 Wed

That's it....two gross outs today....clots and grease...or is the puzzle of the season finale making us just silly?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Secondary meaning to 'platelet' ? (Endseason spoiler) -- FanMan, 18:26:45 05/02/01 Wed

The puzzle of the end deason is making us silly! Dawn the blood clot?...LOL

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Ahh... the clot thickens! -- Solitude1056, 18:39:36 05/02/01 Wed

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> ...the clot thickens... *snerk* -- Masquerade, 09:03:01 05/03/01 Thu

But you know if this metaphor turns out to be more or less applicable, I'll be usurping all your posts for my site. It's concrete and easy to understand, but it also has an emotional impact. Plus blood and Buffy just kind of go together. The whole vampire thing, you know.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: ...the clot thickens... *snerk* -- Solitude1056, 09:16:44 05/03/01 Thu

usurping all *my* posts? Yikes. Okay, the pun was bad, but come on, some thing simply cannot be resisted. Share the love, make everyone else suffer, too!

:)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> That was a collective "your" : ) -- Masquerade, 11:55:30 05/03/01 Thu

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: That was a collective "your" : ) -- Rufus, 13:25:38 05/03/01 Thu

I still can't get over the "lick test" for purity...yuck....but it would save money on those pesky strips....:):):)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Speaking of blood... (Tough Love & End of Season Spoilers) -- Umbriel, 12:27:17 05/03/01 Thu

I'm delurking here -

Possible spoiler ahead * * * * * * * * * *

I found it very interesting that it was the key's blood that Glory was after in Tough Love. Now, it could be that tasting a person's blood is simply one way that she can tell whether or not that person is the key, and that actually using the key would require some other action. However, it could also be (and I'm leaning towards this) that consuming Dawn or her blood is how the key is used, or that Dawn's blood has special properties because she is the key. If Dawn's blood is special in some way, what happens when a vampire (or a slayer or human, for that matter) drinks it? Could it cause a significant change in that individual? One scenario that could result if this is the case: Dawn allows Spike to bite her, either because turning Dawn into a vampire would somehow prevent Glory from getting the key (vampires after all, can't be the key), or because her blood would somehow heal or restore him (although I'm not sure he would voluntarily become good or human). Or he gets the chip out, gets a little hungry and his meal has unexpected results - for good or evil, I don't know. I do think we will eventually get more explanation for what Doc said about having seen Spike with dark hair playing dominoes, and while this could easily refer to the past (although you'd think Spike would remember it then, wouldn't you?) perhaps Doc is seeing a possible future in which Spike has changed. Doc could have prophetic visions and think they're reality or be a being who drifts in time somehow.

And on a somewhat related note, at the beginning of the season, when Buffy tasted Dracula's blood, it seemed to give her extra power and interesting visions. I wonder if a nip of vampire blood could give her extra power against Glory? I kind of hope not, because it seems like a dark and disgusting way to go (as is Dawn becoming a vampire), but from what we saw in the teaser for next week's episode it looks like things are going to get pretty desperate in Sunnydale before it's all over.

Anyhow, I've enjoyed reading everyone's posts and I'm glad to get all this crazy speculation out of my system!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Here we go! -- rowan, 21:07:05 05/03/01 Thu

Well, I've been thinking some crazy stuff along those lines too. What if Dawn is near death from being bled out by Glory, so Spike has to finish her off and vamps her? Or if Spike for some other reason consumes the blood? This could be a way out of the Spike without a soul dilemna and also could reinforce this link alot of people are sensing between Dawn and Spike (anyone notice that Dawn's just a little younger than Buffy was when she met Angel?)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Practical Concerns -- Malandanza, 18:54:59 05/04/01 Fri

The last pre-adult vampire we saw was the annoited one -- he had to be eliminated from the show because the actor was going through to many physical changes (and vampires are not supposed to go through puberty). MT is still quite young and is likely to look a bit different as she continues to age -- it is unlikely that Joss & the writers would vamp her if they intended to keep her on the show for any extended period of time.

The Angel/Buffy romance was acceptable because the actors were both in their twenties at the time. To have a child actress playing a romantic part opposite an adult would generate unnecessary notoriety.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Practical Concerns -- rowan, 19:37:06 05/04/01 Fri

Yes, I guess I wasn't thinking immediately (like next season), but you're right I had forgotten too that JM is about 32 (more than twice her age), so it would be rather shocking.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Practical Concerns -- Umbriel, 20:40:00 05/04/01 Fri

It's possible that the writers planned a 1 to 2 season storyline with a tragic ending (like becoming a vampire) when they created Dawn's character. It would be in line with what we've heard about needing a hanky at the end of the season. The thing is, I think Dawn has become a very interesting character with a great presence, so if I were them I would want to find a way to keep her. A romance with Spike does seem unlikely for the reasons you give above. What I'm interested in is whether her blood might have unusual properties, and whether tasting it might have some kind of transformative effect on a vampire (or even a human). She doesn't have to become a vampire for this to happen. The writers could have had Glory do any number of things as a test to see whether Tara was the key, but they chose blood tasting, something a vampire would also be likely to do. Maybe they just wanted to show Glory's disgustingly evil nature by making giving her cannibalistic appetites, or maybe this is something more. I guess we'll find out soon, at least!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Practical Concerns & Summers Blood (spoilers for season ender ep) -- rowan, 21:12:43 05/08/01 Tue

Yes, this is a very interesting theory about Dawn's blood. After seeing Wanda's latest batch of spoilers (which include a horrible, bone-crunching fall for Spike), it begs the question: Will Spike need some human blood to heal (like Angel before him) and who will it come from? And if it came from Dawn, would that blood have any special properties that would change him in any way? Because, of course, he would then have Summers blood and be part of their family, wouldn't he? And if Buffy does sacrifice herself as rumored, then Spike would be Dawn's family (unless Hank reappears).




Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Simplicity, 22:08:29 05/01/01 Tue

Spoiler Space * * * * * * * * * * I was gratified to see a momentary Ripper appearance (twice in one season!!). I also wonder what type of torture he inflicted on the minion. Obviously, it was nasty enough that he wanted to keep it from Anya and Willow but quick and effective! Love the way his demeanor changed, his voice had no trace of the "Giles stutter" and his tone quiet but menacing (You're talking quite a lot, just not about the right things.).

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Sue, 23:04:23 05/01/01 Tue

I loved seeing "the Ripper" as well. I like it when "the Ripper" comes out and takes charge.

In many ways Giles shined tonight, in others, though I was quite disappointed.

Giles was correct of course about Buffy being the one to take point with laying down the law with Dawn, but I sensed within him a pulling back from Buffy that I think was unhealthy.

Yes, Buffy needed to take point, but Giles should have been there to back her up. Buffy might have been an adult, but she is just an adult, a new adult. Dawn needs Buffy to set her right, Buffy is the one that she is most likely to listen to, but Giles needs to be an adult role model as well for Dawn.

Giles distanced himself from Buffy at the time she needs him the most. When Buffy last week told Giles that she loved him, he didn't seem affected at all. Yes, I realize he is British, and I didn't expect him to break down and hug her or anything like that, but still it seems like he has regressed. Talking about her training. "You were doing so well." Reminds me of a "Watcher's Council" type watcher. The type that would allow the girl he trained to be drugged and then thrown in with a vampire without her powers. I thought Giles has now realized that being a "Watcher" is about more than the training.

I can't quite put my finger on it, and on a surface level he is doing the right things, I don't know if I am explaining myself well. But I guess it centers on how he has avoided Dawn. He said that Buffy is Dawn's only family now (besides Hank who may or may not be a vampire right now). And technically that is correct. But on another level, on the level where all these friends have formed a sort of family, Giles is the adult of the group. He is Buffy's watcher. He is her Master (in the eastern sense of the word), and as such should provide guidance to her, but also by extension her sister as well. He needs to be a 'watcher' for Dawn, a mentor, a master. Yet he is running from that role.

Does he feel like he was a failure as a watcher for Buffy? Is that why he won't open himself up to help Dawn?

Dawn is strong. She is good, and she does care. But she doesn't have all the benefits Buffy did when she grew up. Sure Dawn doesn't have slayer strength, but Giles could teach her self-defense. He could teach her magic. He could teach her all the things he had to learn to become a Watcher. Those skills are important for someone who is near the Slayer and who lives so close to the Hellmouth.

It was great to see Giles take out one of Glory's minions. That was one of the areas where he shined. And again, the advice he gave to Buffy was important. She is going to have to be a grown-up for Dawn. But by the same token Giles is going to have to be a grown-up for both Dawn and Buffy. Buffy can't do it alone. And as an adult friend of the family, Giles is really going to have to get involved in Dawn's life as a mentor, which will take the pressure off Buffy.

Dawn is a good kid. So is Buffy. But even good kids like Buffy and Dawn could use some help from adult friends to make life a little easier. As Buffy's "Watcher" as her "friend" as practically her second father, he should feel compelled to help, yet he is pulling away. Transforming back into dispassionate "Watcher" instead of involved "Watcher."

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Solitude1056, 06:36:45 05/02/01 Wed

I didn't get the impression that Giles was "pulling back," but that he was doing something that even parents have to do at some point: and that's let the kid face facts that it's time s/he grow up & do it hirself. It's not Giles' place to administer Dawn's life as a pseudo-parent, and if he does so, it only risks undermining Dawn's relationship with, and respect for, Buffy. Giles could do it temporarily but the longer he's the "adult" for both B & D, the harder it'd be for Buffy to take that role over. Giles supports her, and he knows it's not easy, but he's not going to do it for her. He hasn't before, and even less so as she matures.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Sue, 19:08:32 05/02/01 Wed

You are probably right. Giles needed to do what he did (but still part of me thinks he should have stood right behind Buffy when she was talking to Dawn). But Giles does have a role in Dawn's life, and he needs to accept that role as her mentor.

Hey, it is either him or Doc. That's the choices. Personally I would much perfer Giles as Dawn's mentor.

And of course, there's always Spike.

Giles needs to get involved in Dawn's life, and quick.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Solitude1056, 20:09:22 05/02/01 Wed

Odd, you didn't mention Xander as a male role model, and given the options, I'd say he's as good a choice as Giles. Then again, I still say the most important person in Dawn's life right now isn't some male role model, but Buffy, and at this point, it's probably only Buffy.

And based on the cliffhanger of the latest episode, it's Buffy and only Buffy who's going to be there 100% of the time to be Dawn's guardian in every sense of the word. So I think Giles was right - Buffy needs to start now with Dawn trusting her as an authority. There won't be time, when fighting Glory, for Dawn to doubt or hesitate when Buffy calls the shots.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Sue, 06:02:54 05/03/01 Thu

Buffy is certainly a very important person in Dawn's life. The most important person in Dawn's life, but I still say that Giles has a role too.

He is the only real adult among them.

He needs to be Dawn's "Watcher" as well as Buffy's. Sure that might not be in the Watcher's Handbook, but by now I thought he has learned that there is that a lot isn't in there.

I don't believe Giles failed as Buffy's Watcher. Dawn needs that same type of guidance. She might not have super powers but she is a very super person. Giles could provide Dawn with the adult mentor she so needs. She will seek one out if Giles doesn't rise up to that role. She will find her mentor on the streets (Doc?).

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Watcher not Father -- Scott L., 20:11:29 05/02/01 Wed

I think Giles was right on the money with his advice to Buffy.

Dawn has been feeling like she's a burden for Buffy, that Buffy doesn't want her around. She feels unreal and unimportant.

Buffy accepting the role of caregiver, provider, and disciplinarian is going to help Dawn through those emotions.

It isn't Giles' role to be a parent to Dawn. It is his role to be a disciplinarian for Buffy and that is just what he did. He told her that she needed to accept responsibility and provide guidance. That is the advice that will bring Buffy to maturity, even if it is a bumpy road.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Watcher not Father -- Sue, 06:06:46 05/03/01 Thu

"It isn't Giles' role to be a parent to Dawn."

Maybe not exactly a parent, but Giles should have a role in Dawn's life. A mentor's role.

It seems like Giles still wants to be a teenager in many ways. While the advice he gave Buffy was sound and correct for that circumstance, Giles must step up as well.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Watcher not Father -- Sue, 06:11:30 05/03/01 Thu

A watcher might not exactly be a "father". Giles isn't Buffy's father. However the role of Watcher and the role of father has some similaries.

When I think of the duty of the "watcher" I think of the term "master" in the eastern sense of the term. Giles is supposed to train Buffy and show her the path of being Slayer.

Dawn as well needs some mentoring. Why Giles? Because he is the only one who can do it. Not that others aren't willing. I am sure Doc would be more than happy to show Dawn the way. But I don't think we would be happy with the way Doc would show her.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Leah, 09:08:21 05/02/01 Wed

Am I the only one who thought Giles didn't do anything to the minion? I thought the whole point of that was to show how unloyal Glory's minions are in contrast to how the Scoobies are willing to die to protect Buffy and Dawm.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Cleanthes, 09:20:11 05/02/01 Wed

I thought he did nothing more than fix the minion with a steely-eyed Ripper stare, too. Oh, and he threatened to tie the minion up with twine -- so I figured that the minion had seen too many Glory-tortures not to have a vivid imagination about what would happen next.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: When the going gets tough, the tough subcontract... -- OnM, 09:26:19 05/02/01 Wed

Perhaps Giles leaned over and whispered to the minion that he didn't need to torture the minion himself-- he would just inform Glory that said minion had betrayed her, and then allow events to proceed naturally from that point on.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> Maybe, but I heard -- Jen C., 10:44:04 05/02/01 Wed

a disturbing "crunching" sound just as Willow and Anya turned towards the twine on the counter. I personally think that Giles twisted the minions nasty, ugly nose.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> Re: When the going gets tough, the tough subcontract... -- Rufus, 14:36:28 05/02/01 Wed

I answered this in a thread further up...watch Giles closely...he has a habit that is consistant everytime he uses the Ripper mode of questioning. As Giles he has a habit of compulsively cleaning his glasses with his handkerchief....as Ripper he wipes his hands after punching someone out.....he does that everytime...plus the tone of his voice changes...he holds no simple interview, he beats the sh*t out of the person....only as much force as he feels is required. His voice also changes and he means business...plus he distracted the girls so they wouldn't see what he was doing. The Ripper is a nasty piece of work.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Shaglio, 11:51:26 05/02/01 Wed

When they went to get the twine, I thought I heard a crunching, grinding sound. I wasn't sure if the noise came from the TV or from somewhere in my room since I turned to look at my computer at that exact moment. Too bad I don't tape the episode so I can go back and rewatch that scene.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Max, 19:50:04 05/02/01 Wed

I don't think Giles did anything.

The minion was a coward. Just the threat of tying the minion up was enough to make him crack.

This scene was to contrast the minion's cowardness with Tara's courage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Ripper's Return (Spoilers for Tough Love) -- Sebastian, 20:20:07 05/02/01 Wed

I've been reading this debate all day at work.

When I returned home - I replayed the scene itht the volume WAY up.

There *IS* a crunching noise when Anya and Willow are turned away.

Although I'm sure the contrast was still done apurpose. Tara refuses to yield despite having her hand crushed to the point where it bled in contrast to the minion getting roughed up by Ripper.


Angel gets all mysty eyed ....Spoilers! -- FanMan, 00:06:15 05/02/01 Wed

5

4

3

2

1

In the latest episode there were four different plot lines going on.

1. Cordy and her acting angst, plus Angel being big brother/protector....funny scene!...:) 2. Gunn choosing between Angel Investigations and his old friends. A tragedy for Gunn... 3. Wesley feeling insicure in his leadership role, partly because of his father, but also because Angel is better at action being the hero and all. Wesley is very good if a problem requires intillectual thought, this ep did not. 4. The Host having his cousin show up! The Host getting flustered, defensive, winy, and trying to play down his knowladge of the demon that showed up in his bar. Very funny! He has been the wise man of the show, it is nice to see he has quirks and foibles like everyone else.

I liked the scene where the Host describes his own world. To paraphrase; everything is black and white, heroes just kill the bad guy, there is no need or desire for social niceties. Angel got mysty eyed! You could see that he would like that world where moral choices are much simpler, also Angel is still auckward socially.

Next ep: Cool, everyone goes to Angel's dream world,and the car!....Army OF Darkness?..naw:)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
last few Angel episodes -- spotjon, 08:27:44 05/02/01 Wed

"4. The Host having his cousin show up! The Host getting flustered, defensive, winy, and trying to play down his knowladge of the demon that showed up in his bar. Very funny! He has been the wise man of the show, it is nice to see he has quirks and foibles like everyone else."

Until the very end of the show, I had assumed that this was just another throw-away episode, not important to the plot, but offering insights into a rather obscure character. But now, I wonder what Cordy and the gang being chucked into black-and-white land will lead to. Will Angel find peace there and want to stay? Will his friends be sacrificed to the double-sun god? Will Angel suddenly realize that his SPF60 is quickly fading? I have no idea how this ties into the season finale, which I previously assumed had something to do with Wolfram & Hart (which it probably still does).

Also, did anybody else notice how much Angel was not bursting into flames in the trailer to next week's episode? Does this mean that only our sun is capable of cindering vampires? Would travelling to another planet not be a problem for vamps, as long as they didn't have the windows open as they were leaving our solar system? I'm sure that we'll be given some sort of explanation next week, but it's certainly fuel for dissention until then!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> Re: last few Angel episodes -- FanMan, 18:40:25 05/02/01 Wed

If the force barrier protecting residences, crosses and stakes are some form of curse from of a God/TPTB, then it could be the same thing for sunlight. Maby none of these things are REAL weaknesses for vampires, and it is a curse to help even the odds for puny humans. If there are no vampires native to the other world, there would be no need to cast that curse there. Alternately, the natives of that world could just be more bloodthirsty than humans-UGH! Then they would not need any help killing vampires.
SPOILERS Concerning the Season Finale -- spotjon, 06:27:59 05/02/01 Wed

From Cinescape Online:

== Joss Whedon is shedding some light on the coming 100th episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer...which just happens to also be the season finale.

While talking to TV Guide, Whedon spoke of the episode to come, saying, "There will be some resolution to the Dawn arc - her being the Key and whether she's Buffy's sister - as well as Buffy's journey about what it means to be the Slayer."

Of course, it will also involve Buffy going head to head with Glory to stop the end of the world from happening. On this point, Whedon says, "Saving the world is what we do here at Buffy Entertainment, so there's going to be some punching and some death, too."

Whedon also reveals that the episode's ending will likely leave fans sobbing in their hankies. He adds, "We did a big finale last year, but not as the final episode, because the story wasn't really connected to the characters. This time, it's more like the old days." ==

Read it at Cinescape.

-spotjon
Re: Buffy Series Finale Speculations (poss. Spoilers) -- Candy, 07:08:27 05/02/01 Wed

I am very pissed off about there no longer being a Buffy The Vampire Slayer series. I have been a loyal fan since the beginning and have taped every episode. How stupid can the WB possibly be to let this series go? Although I have enjoyed each and every episode, I expect more. I am very beyond disappointed with the WB's decision to remove this t.v. series. They really suck for doing that, and I hope you really do break a leg!
Specs on Season Finale(Buffy)-Longer than I expected... -- Unsung Hero, 08:12:07 05/02/01 Wed

I doubt anyone really cares what I think, but....:-)I decided to give my speculation on the season finale.

Ok, so what do we know?- We know "Death is your gift", and we know Dawn has the power to do something REALLY nasty and Glory wants her for that. We also recieved word that we're supposed to need our collective hanky for it....so.....

SOMEONES GONNA DIE

At least, that's how I've got it figured. Now...likely canidates?

Dawn's VERY likely. Buffy would have to kill her to prevent all exsistence from ending(surely that will be the end result of Dawn's power). However, it's been done. But I wouldn't put it past Whedon to do it again. It's not like he hasn't repeated stuff before. Other potential victims? Well, Tara and Anya are fairly expendable. This in't to say they're not great characters- They are, absoloutley, but are they truly essential the show? No.

Tara seems awfully likely, too. But, we've heard Whedon talk about her and how he likes her. But that doesn't give her immunity. Anya is also very background oriented, but there are places left to go with Anya's struggle with humanity, since very little serious air time has been devoted to it, it's mostly been funny. But Anya's death would do VERY little for the plotlines, and would be shock value only, and that's not Btvs. Spike could also bite it, but it's very unlikely in the light of his more recent actions- however, he hasn't reformed exactly, and still believes in evil- he just seems to like Buffy more. And the last honest canidate for death is Buffy herself. Death IS her gift, after all. But, someone pointed out, she already died for the world. But....she came back, kids. A true martyr doesn't exactly come back(and before biblical references are brought out, let's remember Jesus rose from the grave and then went to Heaven, not went on for four more years), and as such Buffy was not a martyr. Basically, the way I got it figured, "death if your gift" has two literal meanings: Death for yourself, or death for someone else. Either Buffy kills someone important, or she dies. And I seriously doubt(and hope) that Glory is not that important person she executes, because that'd be pretty lame seeing as how they gave us the huge production on "Death is your gift", and everyone would answer a big ole' "DUH" to that one. I think Buffy dying would be an interesting twist, one that I don't think Whedon is above making. Now...does this mean Gellar would leave? Not neccesarily. Angel died, and he came back mid-season. Buffy could die and come back a changed woman, a different character than the one we knew. Or she could just leave. I dunno. But I think it's not as unlikely as it seems.

For the first time, I have no idea how a villan will die. I've always had an inkling as to thier tragic flaw- Glory doesn't seem to have one. No weakness, no power source, and no fears and emotions to play on. Dawn is the only thing that comes to mind. So my official prediction is Dawn will focus her world ending powers on Glory and send her lop-sided ass to wherever Gods go when they die. And, I think, either she or Buffy will go with her. Of course, that's my speculation and isn't based on anything whatsoever.

No matter what happens, I don't think the season will end in celebration. Glory is far too powerful to just be beaten like Adam was-there will be consequences, and I'm certain the gang won't hang out at Buffy's and watch "Apocolypse Now" this time.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, AtltS -- rowan, 17:09:09 05/02/01 Wed

Since Glory commented that Spike is "totally useless" --can't be the key, totally impure, can't even be brainsucked -- is that the clue that Spike doesn't die or a red herring to throw us off the scent?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Could Buffy give Ben the gift of death? -- Vulpes, 17:37:09 05/02/01 Wed

I was just thinking about it. If Glory and Ben share the same body, and Ben is the weaker of the two, could Buffy just kill them both by targeting Ben?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> Could Ben kill Glory while she's trying to use The Key? -- rowan, 17:53:32 05/02/01 Wed

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> Re: Could Buffy give Ben the gift of death? -- Jen C., 22:23:09 05/02/01 Wed

I've been thinking that Ben may be a totally innocent bystander. It may be that he has been victimized for centuries (millenia?) - hauling this hellgod around while he tries to make right all of the crud that she does. If it turns out that he is Glory's only weakness, and he's a total innocent, will Buffy kill him?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> Re: Could Buffy give Ben the gift of death? -- Halcyon, 09:28:43 05/03/01 Thu

Ben is hardly a total innocent, he did summon the Queller to kill all the crazy people that Glory had created. An action that nearly got Buffy, Dawn and Joyce killed as well as making Spike scream like S3 Wesley.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
i thought Dawn would -- riffington, 22:15:04 05/02/01 Wed

sacrifice herself to save the world - Buffy could never kill her own sister.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Specs on Season Finale(Buffy)-Longer than I expected... -- change, 03:48:29 05/03/01 Thu

> For the first time, I have no idea how a villan will die. I've always > had an inkling as to thier tragic flaw- Glory doesn't seem to have one. > No weakness, no power source, and no fears and emotions to play on.

Actually, Glory has at least two weaknesses that we know of. First, she has to feed. If she doesn't, she goes insane. Secondly, she has to share her body with Ben, and the two of them are enemies.

There are a couple of ways these weaknesses could be exploited. Usually, Joss seeds these things into earlier episodes. For example, the Superstar episode demonstrated how a reality changing spell could work and so laid the ground work for Dawn's appearance.

The two episodes that come to mind are The Replacement and Blood Ties. In The Replacement, Xander was split into two different beings. The two beings were suppose to represent opposite qualities. The SG could use this spell to split Glory and Ben apart from each other, as well as the third hell god if there is one. This would allow Ben to work directly against Glory. It might also weaken Glory. She may be sharing a body with Ben because she needs to.

In Blood Ties, Willow teleports Glory about a mile up into the air. If Willow finds a way to control that spell, then she could teleport Glory a mile underground. That probably wouldn't kill her, but it would take her a long time to dig herself out, and she wouldn't be able to feed. She could go completely insane before she makes it out.

Just some thoughts on how Glory might be defeated. My point is that Joss likes to lay in the ground work for these things ahead of time. So, one of the previous episodes probably has the solution.


Parallels between Spike and Willow -- Simplicity, 09:26:59 05/02/01 Wed

Just some brain food for thought. . .

Did anyone else catch some Spike/Willow parallels. First, Tara/Drusilla both suffering from insanity. Spike/Willow both willing to stick by their loves despite the mental illness. Willow/Spike both resorting to evilness/dark powers to restore/get revenge for their hurt loved one. Spike was willing to kill Angel to save Drusilla. Willow was willing to use "Darkest Magic" to do so.
What happened with Giles and the minion... -- Leah, 10:38:00 05/02/01 Wed

Am I the only one who thought Giles didn't do anything? It seemed to me like the minion was just a wimp and very unloyal. I saw the scene as a point of contrast b/w Glory's unloyal minions and the Scoobies who would die for Buffy and Dawn.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: What happened with Giles and the minion... -- Simplicity, 11:31:44 05/02/01 Wed

I taped it. When I ran it back you hear a sickening "crunch" off camera when you're focused on Anya and Willow. Ripper definetly did something to the minion.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: What happened with Giles and the minion... -- Rufus, 14:28:15 05/02/01 Wed

When Giles is in Ripper mode he has a habit he does every time he punches someone out.....he wipes his hands in his handkerchief post pummeling. He made a point of distracting the girls with the twine request...and Giles and the minion came to a hasty understanding that the twine was the least of the minions problems. Giles seems to have a compulsion to wipe the violence off his hands everytime he is forced to use his natural talent. What else is he wiping away? He also gets a different tone to his voice making one wonder how many personal interviews his has given in the past. He's very efficient in getting the cooperation of the subject he is questioning. When Giles is in Ripper mode there is a definate feeling of menace and violence that can't be attributed to gift wrapping a minion. Plus, is twine strong enough to hold more than a normal package?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: What happened with Giles and the minion... -- Rufus, 02:25:24 05/03/01 Thu

The order in which Giles did things was first to open the door and hit the minions head with it. Drags the minion into the room. Pulls out handkerchief wiping hands as he requests the minion tell why he was spying. Asks the girls to get some twine. As their backs are turned a loud crunch can be heard, and the minion yelps a bit. Then full cooperation. The crunch wasn't Giles cracking his knuckles, I think he may have leaned on the minion with his foot. If he had used his hands I figure more hand wiping would start up. Nice that he didn't want to corrupt yound minds by showing his violent side in action. In Halloween just before he beat the hell out of Ethan he had Willow leave. In this ep he had them distracted long enough to get the job done.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: What happened with Giles and the minion... -- Solitude1056, 18:22:11 05/06/01 Sun

The verdict is in, but I think they toned it down from the original to something a bit more subtle. The shooting script outlines that:

Giles holds the Minion's gaze. Without looking away.

GILES Quickly you two, on the counter... get the twine. Let's tie him up.

We follow Anya and Willow as they grab the lengths of twine off the counter.

They are startled by A LOUD CRUNCH AND AN ANGUISHED GASP OF PAIN.

Anya and Willow turn to see:

SLOOK Pale and sweaty. Trembling at Giles' feet.

SLOOK (O.S.) (desperate) Don't... I'll tell you anything. Please. Whatever you want to know. Just... I'll... anything...

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: What happened with Giles and the minion... -- Rufus, 20:35:30 05/06/01 Sun

I know intimidation and the beginings of torture when I see and hear it....:):):)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: What happened with Giles and the minion... -- purplegrrl, 13:29:15 05/08/01 Tue

Did Giles get intimidation and torture lessons from Angelus (remembering what Angelus did to him during the whole Acathla-sucking-the-world-into-Hell thing) or was this something he picked up in his mad, bad "Ripper" days??

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> Re: What happened with Giles and the minion... -- Rufus, 15:01:41 05/08/01 Tue

I think it was training from his time with the CoW and natural talent. Which makes one wonder what type of training Watchers get.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> Re: What happened with Giles and the minion... -- Solitude1056, 19:22:49 05/08/01 Tue

I doubt it had much to do with the CoW's training - look at the abilities Wesley had when he arrived... uh, that would be none! *grin*

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: What happened with Giles and the minion... -- Rufus, 21:45:03 05/08/01 Tue

How about an innate gift for persuasion....:):):):) I'm talking Giles here....Wesley is a work in process.


A Seriously Brassed Off...Willow? Spoilers for Tough Love -- Brian, 12:27:05 05/02/01 Wed

Since I joined the Buffyverse in Season two, I have heard many people tell Willow to "go slow," "be careful," "the powers you evoke are dangerous," & "I don't think you can handle it." Well, last night, Willow demonstrated that she really is a powerful witch, and she can handle it. She may not have defeated Glory, but she caused her some serious pain.

It was nice to see Willow put her doubts behind her, and take action, no matter how rash. She needed vengence in the worst way. I imagine that she had a lot of guilt, that because of her fight with Tara, she wasn't there to protect her.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: A Seriously Brassed Off...Willow? Spoilers for Tough Love -- Joann, 18:52:52 05/02/01 Wed

I love that Willow finally used the power of her magic. When she came sweeping into the room with those death eyes I got chills all over it was so creepy. No wonder she is best friends with the Slayer; she is as dark. I liked this episode the best of the season because everyone was in angst and suffering and in peril and may die, just like it use to be.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> Re: A Seriously Brassed Off...Willow? Spoilers for Tough Love -- FanMan, 19:08:14 05/02/01 Wed

Willow has done some very powerefull spells before. This EP was the first time I recall her useing explicitly harmfull magic. Normally she helps Buffy with usefull magic. Some of her other spells had bad effects RE something Blue, but the spells were morally neutral. This EP she was using spells from a book callled Darkest Magic!

I like POWER WILLOW, but I wouldn't want to cross her!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> Re: A Seriously Brassed Off...Willow? Spoilers for Tough Love -- Wiccagrrl, 20:19:53 05/02/01 Wed

The scene with Willow taking on Glory very much reminded me of Giles going after Angelus in Passion. And I loved the "I.Owe.You.PAIN!" line. I thought this ep was really great. I loved them reinforcing the W/T relationship. I thought Tara was truly heroic- her resolved face, knowing what Glory was going to do to her, broke my heart and really impressed me at the same time (not that I thought she'd give Dawn up, but wow)

Gods, I hope they find a way to help Tara fast.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> [> Re: A Seriously Brassed Off...Willow? Spoilers for Tough Love -- Sebastian, 20:25:18 05/02/01 Wed

I'm also glad that they have *finally* fully addressed how powerful Willow has become.

They have, of course, hinted at it the past few seasons - but this episode finally showed just how adept at magic Willow really is.

I also really enjoyed the nature of Willow and Tara's argument. I've had lesbian friends in college deal with the same issues - and it was very well done and realistic.

A sidebar: The concern Anya showed to Willow was sweet - and her comment "I realizd that sounded alot more 'lesbian' than I meant" made me laugh aloud.

Sorry for the ramble..... ;-)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> [> [> Re: A Seriously Brassed Off...Willow? Spoilers for Tough Love -- John Burwood, 12:36:26 05/03/01 Thu

Just a thought - if Willow gets sufficiently vengeful, she has the option of giving d'Hoffryn a chant & acquiring the additional powers of a vengeance demon - as Anya reminded her in Triangle.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> [> Willow the vampire slayer? -- Traveler, 22:00:47 05/02/01 Wed

You know, after this episode I started wondering: how much longer will Sunnydale need Buffy? With Willow seriously discomfiting a god, how could measly vampires stand a chance against her?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> [> [> Re: Willow the vampire slayer? -- Xayide, 13:03:13 05/03/01 Thu

Replace "Bag o' Knives" with "Bag o' Stakes" and vampires are absolutely no longer a threat. She could even do some telekinetic decapitation if she wants.

Still, she's said before that her powers are linked to her emotional state, so perhaps she won't normally be able to access that level of power.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> [> [> [> Re: Willow the vampire slayer? -- FanMan, 17:52:57 05/03/01 Thu

Buffy also fights better when she is pissed. Two things though, Willow was using darkest magic wich probably has some bad side effects, also spells require prep work. If Willow is suprised she will not have time to cast a spell.

Two more things (g) Buffy has faster reflexes and healing powers. Buffy is equal to Willow after Willow has spell ingrediants and preped spells, but Buffy is always ready for The Dance.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Willow the vampire slayer? -- Xayide, 11:24:20 05/04/01 Fri

True, but keep in mind that Willow's telekinetic powers appear to function without spells and ingrediants. Even if they were amped by her rage, she should still be able to toss a stake around fairly easily (and as we've seen, even pencils work just fine).

Speaking of her telekinesis, have they ever shown her use it on living beings, or just objects? It occured to me that if she simply lifted Glory off the ground, her strength would be almost useless and her speed completely so.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: A Seriously Brassed Off...Willow? Spoilers for Tough Love -- Humanitas, 09:49:17 05/03/01 Thu

First of all, I was very happy to see Willow finally become an Official Bad-Ass Spell Slinger. They've been hinting at it for two seasons now, so it has been on my mind, especially since she's seemed so inept ths season (esp. in "Triangle").

I gotta say, I'm a bit worried, though. Magic seems to rely heavily on the emotional state of the user. Willow's strength in htis ep definitely came from grief and anger, which are always dangerous to give in to. Again, not that I think she was wrong, but I bet there will be unforseen consequences from her use of "Darkest Magick."
death as a gift -- gds, 16:54:15 05/02/01 Wed

Am I the only one who believes the whole point of saying "death is your gift" was for Buffy to deny that death is a gift. This denial is the proof that Buffy needed that she is not turning into stone, not losing her humanity. To emphasize that point, the Guide left saying "you're question has been answered" as soon as Buffy made the denial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: death as a gift:reverse psychology -- FanMan, 18:58:52 05/02/01 Wed

Could be. I like youre reasoning. Restless was the same; the scenes were in the form of a dream, and therefore metaphorical and vauge. SNEAKY GUIDE!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> Re: death as a gift:reverse psychology -- rowan, 21:01:00 05/03/01 Thu

It could also be interpreted: "I'm not going to stand here arguing with you because I answered your question."

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: death is a Gift -- Darren K, 09:06:19 05/04/01 Fri

Oracular metaphors. Dream sequences with nuggets of truth. Why should a Buffy fan insist on one interpretation?

Death is a gift because it's a release from responsibility, a release from tragedy.

No one in Buffy's world faces more responsibility and tragedy then a Slayer.She faces a neverending battle. Why shouldn't she want release? This is the same message from "Fool for Love" when Spike contends that all Slayers have a deathwish.It's not a wish to be defeated, it's a wish to be released, to not have to be the hero.

But there is another interpretation in the Guide's words. Buffy shouldn't expect any end--other than death--to her responsibility, or to her life's tragedies. Responsibility in all worlds is cradle to grave and if Buffy--or any of us--find the time and the room in our lives for love and joy, It's because we make it, accept it and welcome it.

Basically, she's telling Buffy to buck up and take it on the chin, just like Slayers before her.

dK

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> Re: death is a Gift -- Nina, 16:17:20 05/04/01 Fri

I am probably way off here, but I remember JW saying somewhere (sorry don't remember where and when - so probably not a good theory) that Buffy would finally find her soul mate at the end of season 5. Could "death" be Spike? I know it's too simple and probably stupid, but there could be a lot of meanings for those words. All of them could be true at the same time. (like the titles of episodes which have many meanings!)

Okay I'm off... should have kept my word and keep reading!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> Re: death is a Gift -- darren K, 19:59:16 05/04/01 Fri

I think that's a perfectly valid theory.Why shouldn't Spike be death?

dK
Angel (the series) seems a little alien to me... -- AngelVSAngelus, 16:57:27 05/02/01 Wed

Epiphany was a great episode. Angel had learned many things during his tenure of "darker dark hero", and he returned to the fold. It still had that great Angel tone that hooked me in the first place, dark and moody, with that tinge of humor and humanity that the gang (and sometimes Angel) provide. I remember after watching it I felt excited to see where it would all go. I've liked where it has gone, to an extent. Angel's new attitude is both refreshing and amusing. He SMILES, he's sarcastic, he wears a little bit of color. But the show's tone, and entire world, seems to have changed. Lighter, I was expecting, but it seems to have gotten REALLY lighter than it was. No longer does Angel walk through smoked screened alleyways under the blanket of the night. The stories from the past two episodes (and to a lesser extent, yesterday's) have been stand alones, not arc stories. We saw only a little of Wolfram and Hart, not looking in on their scheming against Angel but at their promoting Lilah. I'm not even sure WHAT it is that's bothering me about the show now, its just that its so DIFFERENT. I like complicated characters and the gray that Joss keeps between the black and white forces of the B/A universe, but I like for that black and white to EXIST. Demons used to be evil. Yesterday we had a demon, related to the Host, that was a hunter on neither side of the moral spectrum. Maybe I got a little too used to Angel being so dark, and the stories revolving more around the villains with history with the lead character. I dunno,someone make sense of this for me?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Angel (the series) seems a little alien to me... -- Javoher, 18:13:08 05/03/01 Thu

The darkness of Angel was what originally attracted me to this series.

Angel swings from light to dark and back. He's really trying to lighten up these days, be with human friends even if he does feel old (I got the Lorne Greene thing too, but wasn't thinking Bonanza). After firing them and taking on Darla and W&H by himself, going over the edge and having that epiphany, he's realized he needs a community to keep him from falling off a cliff. There was a thread a little while ago about Spike needing a community that accepts him - it's exactly the same for Angel and all he really has are Cordy, Wesley, and Gunn, and now the Host. Interesting how the Host offered a hand of friendship so casually and sincerely. This guy isn't bad at all, and he's not a bad musician either.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> Re: Angel (the series) seems a little alien to me... -- verdantheart, 06:19:47 05/04/01 Fri

I like the host too, and I'm glad they finally gave him a name. He provides a nice counterpoint to the brooding side of the show, especially since he seems to have a connection with TPTB yet is, if anything, freed by it rather than suffering because of it. (Were they thinking "lounge lizard" when they came up with the green scaly makeup?)

It's interesting to see some of his backstory filled in.

- vh


What's up with everyone's hair? (Tough Love spoilers and a frivolous post) -- rowan, 17:26:02 05/02/01 Wed

Did anyone notice that practically everybody had a new 'do for Tough Love? Buffy was back to the totally straight, ironed look (which I personally like alot); Xander finally got his hair cut (although I think it would look better even a little shorter), and Spike's hair looks just a touch longer & wavy (not quite Intervention's bed head, but definitely different).

The cast must have gotten some serious time off between episode shoots.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: What's up with everyone's hair? (Tough Love spoilers and a frivolous post) -- Lynn, 19:21:28 05/02/01 Wed

I like a little frivolity is good once in a while, especially since I think we're going to be in for a lot of strife the next few weeks!

I liked everyone's hair this week too. I think it made them look younger, for some reason, especially Spike, he looked almost boyish, despite the bruises. Spike's hair has been the subject of much posting, I've seen it on other sites. Most didn't liked the slicked down look, and I'm wondering if the change has something to do with the change in his character (see, I'm trying to make this a serious discussion) :)

Lynn
Misc Glory/Ben -- FanMan, 20:05:02 05/02/01 Wed

Glory is a Hellgod-in exhile- so what? Besides eating and harassing the SG what villenace actions has she taken. She is not a villian that I can empathise with. She is stupid as Spike said, her minions are pitifull; who you associate with says something about you. Glory does not have any intelligent servants-inferiority complex? or is it that she is so stupid that no smart villian will ally with her? I hope there is a different villian that is the real big bad for season 5. Glory is powerfull, power is not scary by itself, you need some menacing and random violence. I guess she is scary in the same way that the Cuthplu Gods are; she is so powerfull that humans are literally like bugs in her view- Ouch! My SELF-ESTEEM!

Glory:invulnrable, immortal, very fast,very strong, spellcaster. Glory:insane, arrogent, overconfident Until we get new info the only weakness I can see in Glory is her overconfidence. Overconfidence is a weakness because it fools you into thinking someone is less dangerous than they are. An eight year old kid might look harmless; untill he points a gun at you! Incidentally I remember reading something very funny and not relevant. A burgurlar was killed by a chiwawa after it bit his finger off! He could have bandaged his hand: but the owner came home, so he hid in a clauset and bled to death....LOL

Ben is not any better. He is boring as a regular cast member. If his sister is a God/Godess? why does he act so wimpy? RE pacifism: you can be a pacifist for moral reasons or from a simple aversion to violence. Regardless, you can be strong and a pacifist at the same time. When Ben tried to make a date with Buffy he might have been looking for a reason to talk to her in private about his relationship with Glory. If he has any romantic interest in Buffy, then he is an ass! Two scenerios: Buffy&Ben geting intimate and suddenly Glory is there!...eeewww! Buffy trusting Ben as a friend and leaving Dawn with Ben. Ben has two reasons to tell Buffy that he is related to Glory: so that Buffy would keep Dawn away from him, also he could give Buffy some inside info on Glory.

Ben:cast one spell, unkown power, actually cares about humans to a degree. Ben:Pacifist,reactive instead of taking initiative, wimpy. My thought is that Ben is the Achillies Heel for Glory in some way.

What is the deal? Glory said that Ben was getting stronger, next EP Ben is totally shocked to find out that Glory had been controlling thier body for two weeks!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
more Glory&Ben -- Riffington, 21:49:30 05/02/01 Wed

I never really thought Ben and Glory had a true Jekyll & Hyde existence until Ben got fired for his absence. I was still holding on to the suggestion that they were atleast 2 seperate bodies linked in a shared existence. I'm trying to refer to a scene in the epsiode "Family" where Ben is changing in a locker room, & then a few rows away, the demon stalking him is nabbed from behind by Glory. I suppose that can be attributed to her goddess-ly super speed & strength.

I suppose the way to destroy Glory is to kill Ben

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> Re: more Glory&Ben -- FanMan, 17:56:06 05/03/01 Thu

I remember that scene. If there are two bodies and Glory can act independantly of Ben, then where was Ben for two weeks? Was he concious?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> [> Re: more Glory&Ben -- Solitude1056, 21:28:10 05/03/01 Thu

If Glory's been trapped in Ben's subconcious all this time, perhaps what she said to Tara is Glory's experience of what it's like to be without an Identity - IOW, an awareness of a Self as a separate person from other people. Hm, maybe that's the reason Glory brainsucks, because if she doesn't, she isn't - separate, that is. Ben doesn't need to brainsuck because he contains the identity, where Glory doesn't. That would explain why he held his head & repeated, "I'm Ben, I'm Ben" as if to reaffirm that his identity is the primary for the body.

In my interpretation of things - and given that we've seen them morph into each other - then Ben was "gone" for two weeks, effectively as if he'd been temporarily unconcious. I suppose this is the point where we look to see if Joss was checking out books on MPD three years ago, when that evil brain o' his was coming up with this season's arc!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Misc Glory/Ben -- Solitude1056, 20:22:02 05/03/01 Thu

In the writer's comments I posted above, one of the writers explains that Ben is mortal & always has been. Something just doesn't seem right, there, to me. I mean, usually even the Buffyverse doesn't work so randomly. The PTBs just picked "some guy" out of the crowd who's going to be saddled with this insano-god chick for his whole life? On top of that, Ben has referred to Glory as his "sister," and implied that he's been the Janitor for his "whole life." Maybe we're being led by the nose into another Fight Club rehash, but wouldn't he then consider Glory his "bad half," and not his "sister"? The word choice implies that Glory is somehow an Other, and not just a part of him - excepting his comment to Dreg of "let the best Me win."

I'd posit actually that perhaps Ben bowed out of the Hell-God position, or more likely fled, and became human. Perhaps Glory wasn't able to stop him, or unwittingly aided him, and thus their PTB killed two birds with one stone. Glory gets punished by being trapped in a mortal body with Ben, and Ben gets punished by having to deal with her for the rest of his life! That makes more sense to me, since the idea that Ben was picked out of a random lineup to be saddled with Glory just doesn't add up, based on his comments to Dawn & Dreg. Glory sure doesn't seem like the kind of chick to have done anything good enough (in a Hell's upside-down reasoning) to have warranted such punishment. And I can't think of any other way we'd end up with both being punished at the same time. Forcing them together for a mortal lifetime doesn't make sense as a punishment for two personalities whose priorities are radically opposite, because I can't figure how they could both have committed the "same" crime, being so radically different.

Just my two dinar, after such a long post on related topics!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[> Re: Misc Glory/Ben -- FanMan, 22:35:38 05/03/01 Thu

I started a thread called Musing about Angel. A reply mentioned a serial killer who had his memories and personality erased, then a new personality was put in his body.

Check that, it is similar to your post.


Another stupid question??? -- Emcee003, 09:43:11 05/03/01 Thu

Can Dawn ever be made mortal??? If so that could be the death in the 100th eps. of which we are all trying to figure out.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Another stupid question??? -- darren K, 12:28:03 05/03/01 Thu

Dawn is mortal. Her body is mortal. She can be killed and her DNA (according to the Doc) is Joyce's. Basically, the monks made Buffy's true sister and used it as a host for the KEY. I don't think Dawn is the KEY. I think Dawn is a mortal housing for the KEY.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Another stupid question??? -- Humanitas, 13:08:02 05/03/01 Thu

Um, not to nitpick (Who am I kidding? I'm picking nits furiously in a vain attempt to not go crazy waiting for next week's ep), but Doc doesn't actually know that Dawn has Joyce's DNA. He looks at Dawn's DNA, assumes it comes from Joyce (because Spike idetifies Joyce as "this one's mum"), and says:

DOC: Well, your mother's a good candidate, at least. Strong DNA.

Now, we know that Joyce *does* have strong DNA, as it can withstand the pressures of being The Slayer, in Buffy's case, but that does not mean that Joyce's strong DNA is what Doc is looking at in the sample he takes from Dawn.

'K, getting overly pedantic. Gonna stop now!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Dawn is not storage? plus side note -- imcj, 20:07:38 05/03/01 Thu

May take on it.

It's definitely not stored in Dawn. The key is Dawn and Dawn is the key.

Three monks from the Order of Dagon, used their ability to bend reality and transformed. A bright green energy matrix, that vibrates at a dimensional frequency into human form.

At first I thought she was just an Illusion. This energy matrix just made to look-smell-taste-feel, etc., like a real human. Because a) when Buffy performed the A Tirer la Courture Dawns figure seemed to fade in and out. Like she wasn't there. b) when crazy ppl saw her they saw a green light or nothing at all, a "blank."

However, that has been proven wrong.

Dawn has emotions, she is real. She is yes artificial in the way she became human. But Dawn is real, she is mortal.

side note: It's so interesting how the Order of Dagon have such power. To manifest energy into human flesh. To alter reality and change many PPLs perceptions. That's just coo.

-CJ

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Side note-why were they protecting it in the first place? -- Anthony8, 19:34:12 05/04/01 Fri

I don't know if this has been addressed in any of the threads, but has anyone yet discussed why the monks were protecting the key in the first place. The Knights of "Hack and Slash" seemed to think all their problems would be solved once they destroyed The Key. The monks main purpose (later transferred to Buffy) appeared to be to protect it. Has anybody discussed whether The Key has a bigger significance than enabling Glory to return to her dimension and destroying ours in the process? Granted, that's still about as significant as it comes, so my guess is that The Key came into existence as a by-product of Glory entering our dimension. Glory did tell Dawn in "Blood Ties" that The key wasn't as old as she was.

If the solution is as simple as destroying the Key, presumably the monks would have done that. Of course, maybe it's not possible to destroy it at all. In that case, hiding it until the time has passed for Glory to use it would make sense.

Okay, now I appear to be answering my own question. Have I? Okay then, what would happen to The Key if Dawn were to die before Glory got ahold of her? If The Key goes unused and Glory is properly dispatched, what happens to it then? Alright, that's it. Sorry about the rambling.

A8

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Another stupid question??? -- rowan, 20:42:39 05/03/01 Thu

That would make some sense out of Glory's tasting of blood to determine who is The Key, and the spoilers that indicate Dawn's blood must be spilt by Glory to activate The Key. The pure energy that Tara saw is housed within the human body.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> but why then? -- Solitude1056, 20:50:32 05/03/01 Thu

The other brainsucked folks noticed Dawn as a "blank" right away - but (I think) Tara's the first to call her a bright light and/or the color green. Why then, and why hadn't Tara remarked (as the other victims had) on Dawn's non-being as soon as Tara saw Dawn? That just seemed odd/inconsistent to me, and Joss isn't usually inconsistent without a good reason.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> Yes, vg point! (spoilers ahead) -- rowan, 20:55:19 05/03/01 Thu

I thought in the last ep that Tara seemed alot more with it than most of the brainsuckees. She was better able to interact with others (although not to actually converse). Do you think this is just because she's a newbie, or could that "Tara Resolve Face" have been a way that she was able to slightly protect herself? Spoilers lead us to believe that she will be the one who knows how to destroy Glory.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> Re: Yes, vg point! (spoilers ahead) -- Solitude1056, 21:02:59 05/03/01 Thu

Spoilers lead us to believe that she will be the one who knows how to destroy Glory.

They have? Uh, I'm still back with the "when is Melissa Gilbert going to show up" disinformation thread. Call me slow on the uptake, I guess. *grin*

But you're right, Tara was more with it - and Willow commented that at points she could tell Tara was "in there." At the time I took this as wishful thinking but I'm right in guessing that the identity is what's gone, and the soul's what loves, then it makes sense that Tara may still express affection, if only non-verbally.

Two things: I was wondering about the whole "tara as a vessel" line of thought that's been going down since Restless. If Tara's identity is returned to her, and it has to be stolen back from Glory, how much of Glory will come along for the ride? Is there anything of Glory once those stolen identity-energies are gone? And second: maybe it's heightened emotion that makes the Key shine so bright. Dawn was calm until Glory pulled away half the wall and discovered them - and anyone's emotional barometer would go bonkers at such an interruption. Maybe as Dawn has become more human, her Key-part has been better & better cloaked, but fear's a pretty primal thing, and no better way (other than anger) to take you to your most basic state.

Dunno... comments, questions? :)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Yes, vg point! (spoilers ahead) -- rowan, 21:11:48 05/03/01 Thu

"Spoilers lead us to believe that she will be the one who knows how to destroy Glory.

They have? Uh, I'm still back with the "when is Melissa Gilbert going to show up" disinformation thread. Call me slow on the uptake, I guess. *grin*"

Well, so true, but I never did believe the whole Melissa Gilbert thing -- sounded way too strange to me. The Tara stuff sounds alot closer, because we've seen that other brainsuckees have insight that others don't have (they recognized The Key, etc.). Plus, someone soon has to give the SG some kind of clue. Have we ever gone this far into an arc where they are so clueless?

I wondered if Dawn was vibrating (sounds kind of risque) at a higher frequency when Glory arrived (I'd be peeing my pants, so I can sympathize). It is strange that Tara didn't notice Dawn's keyness until Glory arrived. Does The Key get brighter when The Keymaster is around (oops, sounds a little GhostBusterish suddenly).

I got the impression from Glory's impassioned ramblings to Tara before she brainsucked her that she had experienced the brainsuck hell herself -- she described it so realistically. Maybe everyone's wits are hanging out together in hell waiting for release.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Yes, vg point! (spoilers ahead) -- Rufus, 22:12:46 05/03/01 Thu

Willow kinda answered the question for me when she mentioned the drugs the hospital gave her to keep Tara calm. Drugs can only do so much. Tara could have been close enough to another dose that the stress of Glory arriving and the amount of fear that would generate makes sense that she could have fought off the effects of the drug and seen Dawn for what she is for the first time. Remember Tara understands that Glory is the one that hurt her, and she would be outside of reality so she could have an unintentional outburst such as the one she had when she identified Dawn as the key. Everyone was pretty freaked...not often that the front of a building gets torn open by a normal looking girl.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Another stupid question??? -- Emcee003, 12:40:22 05/03/01 Thu

I Am in the UK so the last eps I saw was Dawns attempt to return her mother thanxs 2 Willow. So how many Eps eps behind am I with the all u????? but the next is on in 23 1/2 hr.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Another stupid question??? -- Wiccagrrl, 20:31:18 05/03/01 Thu

Not too far behind. The ep you mentioned, Forever, is ep 17, so I'm assuming you'll be getting ep 18 tomorrow. We got ep 19 on Tuesday, and will get ep 20 this coming Tuesday.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Another stupid question??? -- Emcee003, 00:51:57 05/04/01 Fri

THanks (I thought i was only a few)


Vengeance & Consequences (oops, long) -- Solitude1056, 18:50:16 05/03/01 Thu

This got kind of lost in another thread but I decided to repost because it leads into something else I've been thinking about today. First, Tara's expression: just as Glory made it clear Tara was going to get brain sucked, we saw Tara's Resolve Face. I'm still curious as to whether anyone else has theories of what she was thinking. As I stated before, she's not without resources. Perhaps whatever she formulated (or decided upon) is why Glory felt so buzzed afterwards. Or maybe it was just pure determination that Glory wouldn't get the information, at any cost, and the satisfaction of knowing that at least Buffy and Willow would kick Glory's lopsided ass back to Kingdom Come.

There's also been a lot of speculation that we're finally getting to see Willow being as powerful as some have suspected she is. Well, she may be that powerful, but right now she's got reason to be: she's royally pissed off! In a realverse situation, if a drunk driver had hit Tara as she stood on a street corner, Willow might've gone through solid steel and a wall of fire to make the guy suffer. Barring that option, her pain is the kind that leads people to begin things like MADD and support groups for families of murder victims. It's the same as Buffy needing something physical to blame for her mother's illness. It's just that Willow had less at her disposal (such as physical strength) but was willing to use what she had and put all of her soul's muscle into following it through. And she could do that - for once - and be completely focused because, in some ways, she had nothing left to lose. Nothing. Tara, mentally, is gone and in the Buffyverse, there's no guarantee for Willow that Tara will ever get better.

Glory messed with the wrong Scooby - not Tara, Willow - when she messed with that Scooby's beloved. Unlike the other Scoobies, Willow's the one who had someone she loved leave her because of a third person's involvement. Oz up & left Willow, without any input from her. She found him asleep and nekkid with someone else - and that kind of betrayal is hard to forget or just put aside, especially when it results in the other person deciding they can't be with you. Oz didn't stick around to give Willow the chance to work through the anger coming from that discovery, nor did Willow have the opportunity (or guts) to unleash her anger on the Other Woman, though she tried. In some ways, she was still learning her Art, and in some ways, she'd not truly lost Oz - yet - so she still had something to lose. There's the feeling of wanting to kill the Other Person, and yet the holding-back because there's just the little bit of suspicion that this other person is someone Oz liked more than her.

Then along comes Glory and damages Tara. Well, perhaps somewhere in her mind, Willow saw herself as "taking it" the first time, without her say-so and no part in the resulting end-of-the-relationship. This time, she's gonna do it differently. She's been through the heartbreaking loss when someone else takes away the one she loves. She stood by and watched her beloved go, and this time she will, too, but not without a serious fight. She's older, she's stronger, she's smarter, and now she knows herself well enough to know - despite Buffy's naively thinking otherwise - that she's not willing to look back and say, "I should've done something." That's why Willow fought back, and that's why she was twenty times stronger than she's been before. I don't know if she'd be able to muster that level of focus again, just for anything. On top of that, this isn't an emotional power that goes everywhere: it's very focused. Willow didn't waste time on the minions. She wasn't interested in them; she was only interested in the object of her anger. Nor can I see her wasting 40 vampires (if Tara had been killed by a vamp), unless it's necessary to get to the single one that hurt Tara. At that point, her mission - so to speak - is complete and she's drained of her vengeance.

Now, for the second half: we saw no consequences, unlike Willow's previous spells. For starters, I'd suggest that's because her vengeance was not going against the grain of the Buffyverse. She may have unwittingly been acting with the PTB behind her and thus her ability to not only slow Glory down but also to recover so quickly. Where her other spells have verged on cross-grain magic, this one may've been so properly with the grain that she would be even more powerful as a result. Swimming with the current is gonna get you there a lot faster, and perhaps this time the PTB's current was behind her all the way.

Curiously (and tangentially), I've noticed Anya speaking with less stilted pronounciation, and her phrasing has been relaxing into a more human manner since Joyce's death. She blurted out an offering to sleep with Willow, but the cadence was natural. It's subtle & though it's been years since I've done shakespearean acting, cadences are something I pay attention to. (Don't know if anyone else noticed it, as no one's mentioned it.) Anyway, that indicates to me that Anya's slowly becoming more human on the inside, and thus I wonder if she may also become more able to use magic, as a result. Perhaps that's part of what one needs to really kick-ass in magic, is something like Willow's in-touch-ness with her Will (and to some extent, her anger, which is sometimes the same thing). The farther Anya sat from her emotions, the harder it may have been to work magic. She was angry about losing her status as Vengeance Demon, hence her ability to muster the anger to try & regain that in Doppelgangerland. But since then she's adamantly insisted she's powerless, as she struggles with her humanity. Perhaps as she moves closer to her emotions, the more she may be able to assist Willow. Hopefully my intuition is right that this is a sign that Anya will be able to support Willow, magickally, in the upcoming head-ons with Glory.

And last issue/idea: what if we think of sanity, like the soul, as a complete unit? A soul is required for Glory to suck the person dry, but in her case, she's leaving the soul behind - and taking the personlity; that is to say, the person's identity. The soul is what makes the difference between whether she can take it or not - Spike has plenty of personality but no soul. It's where your memories, thoughts, reactions, preferences, tastes, likes, dislikes, reside. We know identity is not the same as the soul, since vampires continue to have an distinct personality similar to pre-vampism despite the demon taking over. We've called it sanity, since in its absence the person is insane, but what if they're not insane so much as a soul without any roots or foundation of Identity? How apropos, since this season's theme is identity. And that would explain the non sequitorial uncertainty, and random verbal repetition, on the part of the brainsucked: they grasp at statements and random thoughts and hold onto them, as the soul attempts to shape some sort of identity in the vacuum left behind.

So... how would one restore the Identity to Tara, and what would happen to Glory? Is Identity something that you can craft out of thin air - thus restoring Tara without dealing with Glory's refusal to give it up - or is it like the soul: a complete unit, that can be bartered, taken, restored, but not recreated from whole cloth? I'm suddenly thinking of Joss' being influenced by Sumerian mythologies, but unfortunately I'd have to go into the Egyptian understanding of the soul to find a precedent for this perspective. The Sumerian (and later Babylonian) philosophies tend to speak more of "what the gods do" and less of "who a person is." The Egyptians had a complex understanding (rivaled only by modern Voudoun) of the different areas that together define a person's spirituality: the Ba, the Ka, the Akh, the Shadow, the Name, and several others I can't remember now. Each was distinct, and it was necessary in the funeral rituals to observe each spiritual part of the person. If we view Glory's interaction with Tara, compared to the other brain-sucked victims, then to me it appears that we're dealing with the same type of perspective on What A Person Is. It's a compilation of a series of interdependent aspects that together make up the person: a soul, an identity, a body, and what else?

I'll stop there, but hopefully that's enough to get you guys on the track of how I'm seeing the recent actions...

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Vengeance & Consequences (oops, long) -- rowan, 20:27:29 05/03/01 Thu

I don't have much of any insight to add, except thanks for helping me think about Willow in a different way. I was fairly "anti" the revenge magick, primarily because it seemed against the Wiccan Rede, but I hadn't stopped to think that maybe it was acceptable in the Buffyverse. Food for thought.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Vengeance & Consequences (oops, long) -- Rufus, 22:31:10 05/03/01 Thu

I remember Glory describe to Tara what happens when one is brain sucked...

Glory: "It doesn't kill you. What it does...is make you feel like you're in a noisy little dark room, naked and ashamed, and there are things in the dark that need to hurt you because you're bad. Little pinching things that go in your ears and crawl on the inside of your skull. And you know, it the noise and teh crawling would stop, that you could remember how to get out. But you never, ever will."

That remained with me because when Glory brain sucks someone she doesn't get their talents or memory she gets the ability to interact in our reality. So to me that means that the element that she removes is the unity of the mind the ability to use your personality and memories, or your mind, in this reality. I think that she was referring to how she, Glory feels when she has to feed. I think that she loses her ability to interact in this reality. So what has to be returned to Tara is that element of the mind that takes her from outside reality back into reality. Tara is lost in the dark room, we only have to find out what will open the door to let her out.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Vengeance & Consequences (oops, long) -- Solitude1056, 22:54:05 05/03/01 Thu

then don't go reading the spoilers at www.slayage.com - they're, uh, quite extensive. (and they include all the disinformation, too, which is rather hilarious to read for the past few episodes!)

:-)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Vengeance & Consequences (oops, long) -- Rufus, 23:04:07 05/03/01 Thu

I read spoilers and just take them as partial truths, and total fibs......they are very entertaining....:):):)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Vengeance & Consequences (spoilers, Ep 21) -- Wiccagrrl, 23:07:29 05/03/01 Thu

Spoiler space for Ep 21 (Weight of the World)

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

The TV Guide synopsis for this ep mentions the Buffy goes into a catatonic state, and that Willow must use her powers go into Buffy's mind and help her find her way back. I really think this is going to tie into the Tara situation- that helping Buffy teaches Willow how to help Tara, or vice versa. The description Glory gave of what Tara's condition would be (of feeling trapped, lost, trying to find your way out...but you never will) just ties in so well to the type of pathworking (for lack of a better word) Willow will be doing with Buffy.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> Re: Vengeance & Consequences (oops, long) -- Malandanza, 23:55:22 05/03/01 Thu

A few comments:

***Oz up & left Willow, without any input from her. She found him asleep and nekkid with someone else - and that kind of betrayal is hard to forget or just put aside, especially when it results in the other person deciding they can't be with you. Oz didn't stick around to give Willow the chance to work through the anger coming from that discovery, nor did Willow have the opportunity (or guts) to unleash her anger on the Other Woman, though she tried. In some ways, she was still learning her Art, and in some ways, she'd not truly lost Oz - yet - so she still had something to lose. ***

Willow's curse targeted both Oz and Veruca -- and it seemed to me that Oz was the principle target since it was his picture being used. In accordance with the rules of sympathetic magic, the spell should have been more easily able to affect him than Veruca (at least I do not remember seeing an item of Veruca's being offered to the lower beings). Also, remember that Oz found Willow and Xander curled up in bed together when he and Cordelia were trying to rescue them -- Oz forgave Willow's conscious betrayal (and a betrayal that occurred over an extended period of time) -- Willow refused to even discuss the Veruca/Oz issue. In my opinion, Oz's betrayal was not entirely his fault -- he is not responsible for his actions as a wolf -- while Willow's betrayal is unjustifiable.

***Now, for the second half: we saw no consequences, unlike Willow's previous spells. For starters, I'd suggest that's because her vengeance was not going against the grain of the Buffyverse. She may have unwittingly been acting with the PTB behind her and thus her ability to not only slow Glory down but also to recover so quickly. Where her other spells have verged on cross-grain magic, this one may've been so properly with the grain that she would be even more powerful as a result. Swimming with the current is gonna get you there a lot faster, and perhaps this time the PTB's current was behind her all the way.***

I believe the only currents in the Buffyverse are evil currents. When Willow attempts harmful, destructive spells she is much more effective than when she attempts helpful or innocuous spells. Whoever or whatever powers these spells has a vested interest in their outcomes -- these creatures provide the power necessary for magic that has an evil intent -- no need to distort the outcome. Positive magic must be carefully worded to prevent an equivocating fiend from perverting the intent of the spell.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> Re: Vengeance & Consequences (oops, long) -- Wiccagrrl, 09:08:15 05/04/01 Fri

Willow's curse targeted both Oz and Veruca -- and it seemed to me that Oz was the principle target since it was his picture being used. In accordance with the rules of sympathetic magic, the spell should have been more easily able to affect him than Veruca (at least I do not remember seeing an item of Veruca's being offered to the lower beings). Also, remember that Oz found Willow and Xander curled up in bed together when he and Cordelia were trying to rescue them -- Oz forgave Willow's conscious betrayal (and a betrayal that occurred over an extended period of time) -- Willow refused to even discuss the Veruca/Oz issue. In my opinion, Oz's betrayal was not entirely his fault -- he is not responsible for his actions as a wolf -- while Willow's betrayal is unjustifiable.

Gonna take issue on a number of points. First, Oz did make the decision to lock Veruca in the cage with him, before he wolfed out. Oz' attraction to Veruca was very intense, even at non-wolfy times. And very obvious to Willow. And as for not being willing to talk to Oz about it, that's just not true. She freaked at first, but she *did* want to try and work it out. Oz was the one who wasn't willing to try and stick around and work things out together, and told her no when she asked "Don't I get a say?" And, if you remember, Oz pulled away for a bit after the Xander thing, too. He didn't immediately say "it's ok, honey, I understand" In fact, I remember him telling her to leave him alone, and that her feeling guilty was "not his problem" at that point. Not that that reaction wasn't justified, but I think it's unfair to say Willow wasn't willing to forgive Oz the way Oz forgave her. She didn't want him to leave. She wanted to talk things out, try and work them out. Just like in the Xander sitch, Oz set the pace, he decided to walk away, he decided when to come back. Unfortunately for him, by the time he came back in NMR, he'd been away too long. Willow'd moved on. His timing was off.

Both people (Willow with Xander, Oz with Veruca) acted wrongly. I don't condone the W/X kissage, or more importantly her lying to Oz. I just don't think you can give Oz a free pass on his actions in handling the Veruca situation at non-wolf times, which IMO were more the problem/issue than whatever acts Oz/Veruca committed when they wolfed out.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[> [> [> Re: Vengeance & Consequences (oops, long) -- Malandanza, 12:45:34 05/04/01 Fri

I fear we've drifted off topic a bit, but I do like discussing Willow's moral failings :)

I see the Oz/Oz-wolf dynamic as analogous to the Angel/Angelus dynamic. When Angelus has been in control, Angel is powerless. When Angel is present, Angelus is still there, lurking in the background, trying to corrupt Angel. We see the same pattern with Oz -- he black out completely when the wolf takes over. However, when he is Oz, the wolf is still there, just below the surface (and, we have seen, can come out during periods of emotional trauma). And both Oz and Angel blame themselves for the actions of their alter-egos.

***Gonna take issue on a number of points. First, Oz did make the decision to lock Veruca in the cage with him, before he wolfed out.***

Here are some of Veruca's remarks about pre-wolfing:

Veruca: Right before sunset, I get a little buzzed, you know? ...Do you feel it? It's like blood boiling.

As sunset approaches, Oz has less control over his actions; the wolf begins to dominate. So even the period just before he turns is wolf-dominant.

***Oz' attraction to Veruca was very intense, even at non-wolfy times. And very obvious to Willow.***

The werewolf hunter had mentioned that 'wolves are attracted to sexual energy. It does seem as there is a reciprocal power -- a sort of animal magnetism -- that Veruca, at least, was radiating. It was not merely Oz who felt the affect of Veruca, but all the men. Consider Giles on Veruca when she is singing at the Bronze (and the rest of the Scoobies are playing down her charisma because they know Willow is jealous):

Giles : Really? I think she's rather remarkable. Such presence for someone her age.

By contrast, if we examine the interaction between Oz and Veruca as Oz was waiting for Willow at the lunch area, there was no flirtation -- all the talk was business -- amps and things. Willow's jealousy made the meeting awkward when she interrupted a conversation she clearly knew nothing about. Why shouldn't Oz have been talking shop with a fellow musician? He never placed any restrictions on who Willow could associate with or when (not even Xander).

***And as for not being willing to talk to Oz about it, that's just not true. She freaked at first, but she *did* want to try and work it out. Oz was the one who wasn't willing to try and stick around and work things out together, and told her no when she asked "Don't I get a say?"***

Initially, Willow was unwilling to listen to anything Oz tried to say -- she dismissed the comparison between her and Xander as trivial, she tried to cast a spell to make Oz forever miserable -- it was not until after Oz was packed and ready to leave that she decided that she wanted to talk. Remember that Oz had just killed a fellow human being -- definitely a disturbing experience. He was not leaving out of spite, jealousy or any other base motive -- he was leaving becasue:

Oz : No. Veruca was right about something. The wolf is inside me all the time, and I don't know where that line is anymore between me and it. And until I figure out what that means, I shouldn't be around you... Or anybody.

***Both people (Willow with Xander, Oz with Veruca) acted wrongly. I don't condone the W/X kissage, or more importantly her lying to Oz. I just don't think you can give Oz a free pass on his actions in handling the Veruca situation at non-wolf times, which IMO were more the problem/issue than whatever acts Oz/Veruca committed when they wolfed out.***

The Willow/Xander relationship happened over an extended period of time -- premeditated. Oz/Veruca lasted two days. Willow admitted to Buffy that she found keeping secret exciting (after Buffy had been discovered harboring a returned Angel). For Oz, the secret was excruciating. Oz has only loved one person during his entire life. Willow has had Xander, Oz and Tara -- and it seems he is a distant third in Willow's affections. Consider the reasons why Willow began dating Oz: she was jealous of the X/C relationship, she thought by dating a "cool" older guitarist she would become less nerdy, curiousity about sex (she complained to Buffy that Oz was moving too slowly in their relationship). Where is the love? Oz was more committed to Willow than Willow was to Oz (obviously -- Oz traveled the world to